So Vanity Fair examined the New York Times to see whether there have been equal amounts of space devoted to news over the years. For the author, the outcome was surprising, but for this journalist, it wasn't.
Vanity Fair found the Times devotes more space to news content in the A section now than it did 10 years ago. Although the blog alludes to the cause, burgeoning advertising revenue, it fails to comment on how this reflects the larger picture. Newspapers are competing for ad dollars more and more, and the threat to the newspaper ever looms. How do we afford to pay for those important journalistic endeavors?
Few papers have overseas correspondents anymore. I used to dream of writing stories that mattered about people in other countries, now I have few hopes of realizing that dream, unless working for a foreign paper. This brings me back to the idea that if more newspapers were non-profits, then the pressure to make money would be lessened and the ability to spend money to get stories to make a difference would increase.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment