So how is one to tell the faux from the Fabergé? It's hard to say. Some Web sites look so real they are very convincing. Sourcing is often the only way to determine the quality of information. Government Web sites are trustworthy, but if you're going to use the information in a Wikipedia article then you had best follow the sourcing links to find out how accurate the information really is.
What I see is a merging of user-generated content and expert content. Participatory journalism is the way of the future. It will blend reader contributions, from photo submissions to videos caught on cell phones, with stories researched and written by professionals.
1 comment:
One great thing I think the Web has done is make each online article a conversation. I find it fascinating to read user comments on any story, just to see how it is received or what kind of discussion it invokes.
As for user-generated content, I think there's definitely a place for it breaking news stories -- witness accounts. But I still cringe every time I see something attributed to Wikipedia. Yes, I'm talking to you, Eugene Weekly...
Post a Comment